ArticlePest management science2025
Feeding by slugs on maize imposes variable productivity costs but can induce compensatory growth under some conditions.
Article in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Managing pests by increasing predators through late termination of cover crops.Pest management science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn contrast to herbivorous insect pests, relatively little attention has been given to how terrestrial mollusks affect plant productivity. This lack of attention is problematic because in some crop-growing areas, particularly those that have adopted no-till farming practices and get ample rain, slugs are often the most challenging invertebrate pests that farmers face, but there is a poor understanding of how slug feeding on young crop plants influences their growth. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a greenhouse experiment that exposed two different ages of young maize plants to slug and mechanical damage and then tracked their growth and development for 6 weeks. To complement our greenhouse experiment, we also analyzed legacy data of slug damage and maize productivity from three field experiments conducted over six growing seasons in no-till crop fields in central Pennsylvania, USA.
resultsResults from our greenhouse experiment suggested that slug and mechanical damage are largely similar but also indicated that low levels of slug damage can induce compensatory growth. Notably, some of our field research corroborated that low levels of slug feeding can positively influence maize yield, whereas other results indicated that heavier levels of slug damage can have the expected negative influence on maize yield.
conclusionOur data suggest that slug damage is similar to mechanical damage and that the influence of slug feeding on maize development or productivity depends on the amount of damage received and the local growing conditions. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.