ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Prenatal hemoglobinopathy screening & prevention in India: A cross-sectional study.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden of sickle cell disease among pregnant women in central India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Genetics: Current Applications and Challenges.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- New thalassemia mutations from West Bengal.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Prenatal hemoglobinopathy screening in India: Enhancing coverage, counselling, & continuity.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Authors' Response.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives India carries a significant burden of hemoglobinopathies, with beta-thalassemia and sickle cell disease (SCD) carrier rates ranging from 3-40 per cent by region. Despite the importance of universal screening, widespread prevention is challenging due to socio-cultural stigma, low awareness, and poor follow up. Sankalp's thalassemia prevention program used targeted prenatal screening rather than mass or cascade screening. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of a targeted antenatal screening strategy for the prevention and management of severe hemoglobinopathies in India. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in 36 districts across five Indian States between April 2023 and March 2024. Pregnant women within 20 wk gestation attending public hospitals were screened for hemoglobinopathies using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). If a woman was identified as a carrier, her partner was tested. At-risk couples received molecular confirmation, followed by prenatal testing and counselling to support informed decisions. Results Of the total 34,647 enrolled women, 33,270 (96%) were screened, identifying 2,268 (6.8%) carriers, 903 (2.7%) beta thalassemia, 1,176 (3.5%) SCD, and 189 (0.6%) other hemoglobinopathies. Partners of 1,959 women (86.4%) were tested, identifying 339 at-risk couples. Testing was unnecessary in five cases due to benign mutations. Fetal testing was completed in 246 pregnancies, identifying 65 affected foetuses. Among these, 44 families (68%) chose to discontinue pregnancy. One affected birth was prevented for every 787 families enrolled. Interpretations & Conclusions The Sankalp program for hemoglobinopathies prevention demonstrates that targeted antenatal screening within public healthcare is a feasible, effective, and scalable strategy for hemoglobinopathy prevention in socio-economically disadvantaged populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.