ArticleBiomarkers in medicine2026
Serum inflammatory and coagulation markers in GBS infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Biomarkers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Group B Streptococcus Rectovaginal Colonization Rates and Serotype Distribution among Pregnant Women, Asia-Pacific Region, 2014-2025.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the relationship between Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection in pregnant women and adverse pregnancy events (APEs), as well as serum inflammatory factors (IFs) and coagulation parameters.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 2,200 late-pregnancy women who delivered at Maternal and Child Health Hospital from March 2020 to January 2023. Data on GBS infection, serotyping, immunofluorescence, coagulation parameters, and APEs were collected. APE incidence was compared between groups, and logistic regression was performed to analyze inflammatory factors and coagulation parameters in GBS-positive women with and without APEs.
resultsAmong the participants, 593 (26.95%) were GBS-positive, and 1,607 (73.05%) were GBS-negative. The GBS-positive group had significantly higher rates of preterm birth, intrauterine infection, premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid compared to the GBS-negative group (
conclusionGBS infection increases the risk of adverse pregnancy events and is closely associated with alterations in inflammatory and coagulation markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.