SynthesisThe Laryngoscope2026
Materials Employed in Preoperative Embolization for Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Materials Employed in Preoperative Embolization for Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A Meta-Analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCharacterizing outcomes and complications between preoperative embolization materials in the treatment of JNA to help guide clinical management. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane databases. REVIEW
methodsThis systematic review involved a search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 31, 2025. Meta-analysis of continuous measures (mean) and proportions (%) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was conducted. Studies were accessed for bias via the JBI appraisal tool.
resultsOf 2690 abstracts screened, 40 studies (N = 448) were included. Mean age was 16.1 years (range: 6-29) with 100% males. Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) was the most common type of embolization material (59.2%, 95% CI: 54.6-63.6), followed by cyanoacrylate glue, gelfoam, onyx, and coils. Patients treated with gelfoam were not found to have any complications, and the most intraoperative blood loss [346.7 mL (95% CI: 313.9-661.2)] was followed by coils [7.4%; 515.3 mL (95% CI: 109.2-2417.5)], PVA [13.4%; 455.6 mL (95% CI: 313.9-661.2)], Onyx [27.6%; 493.0 mL (95% CI: 334.9-725.6)], and cyanoacrylate glue [47.8%; 504.8 mL (95% CI: 322.9-789.0)], respectively. TMJ pain, trigeminocardiac reflex, and headaches were the most common embolization complications (10.6%-12.8%).
conclusionStudies have shown that embolization improves outcomes for JNA, but the choice of embolization material remains a topic of debate. This study found PVA is the most commonly utilized material and that there may be differences in outcomes and complications between embolization materials. Additional studies should be conducted to rigorously evaluate the differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.