ArticleEuropean burn journal2025
Development of a Device for Defatting Full Skin Grafts Through Mechanical Defatting in Children and Adolescents.
Article in European burn journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Full-thickness skin grafts are a cornerstone in reconstructive surgery for extensive skin defects, particularly in pediatric patients, where rapid vascularization is essential for successful engraftment. Traditional defatting methods using scalpels and scissors are labor-intensive and increase the risk of graft or operator injury. To improve efficiency and safety, a mechanical defatting device called LOMA (named after the inventors Loff and Maja) was developed at Klinikum Stuttgart. This study evaluates the first 28 transplants performed with it, assessing graft outcomes using the POSAS and comparing physical properties of the grafts with those of healthy contralateral skin, ankle skin, and palmar skin using DermaLab Combo's ultrasound and elasticity probes. Results showed that grafts prepared with LOMA exhibited similar physical characteristics to contralateral healthy skin. Differences in elasticity were observed when compared to ankle skin, and significant disparities were found when compared to palmar skin. POSAS scores averaged 3.3 from patients and 2.2 from physicians, indicating satisfaction with functional and aesthetic outcomes. The findings support the effectiveness of full-thickness skin grafts, particularly when prepared using the LOMA system. Further multicenter studies are recommended to compare LOMA-prepared grafts with those using conventional techniques to quantify the added value of this mechanical defatting approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.