ReviewBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2025
Pathway Analysis Interpretation in the Multi-Omic Era.
Review in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systems-level transcriptomic analysis reveals synapse-related gene dysregulation in peripheral leukocytes of MDD patients.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Problems With GO Enrichment as an Endpoint for Ecological Omics Interpretation.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics-Guided Design and Safety Engineering of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics: From Molecular Perturbation to Predictive Toxicology and Precision Translation.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Omics technologies in aquafeed: unlocking the black box towards systems biology.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Pathway-Level Reorganization of Genetic Signals Associated with Low Bone Mineral Density Across the Menopausal Transition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A practical guide to functional enrichment analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In bioinformatics, pathway analyses are used to interpret biological data by mapping measured molecules with known pathways to discover their functional processes and relationships. Pathway analysis has become an essential tool for interpreting large-scale omics data, translating complex gene sets into actionable experimental insights. However, issues inherent to pathway databases and misinterpretations of pathway relevance often result in "pathway fails," where findings, though statistically significant, lack biological applicability. For example, the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) pathway was originally annotated based on its association with observed tumor necrosis, while it is multifunctional across diverse physiological processes in the body. This review broadly evaluates pathway analysis interpretation, including embedding-based, semantic similarity-based, and network-based approaches to clarify their ideal use-case scenarios. Each method for interpretation is assessed for its strengths, such as high-quality visualizations and ease of use, as well as its limitations, including data redundancy and database compatibility challenges. Despite advancements in the field, the principle of "garbage in, garbage out" (GIGO) shows that input quality and method choice are critical for reliable and biologically meaningful results. Methodological standardization, scalability improvements, and integration with diverse data sources remain areas for further development. By providing critical guidance with contextual examples such as TNF, we aim to help researchers align their objectives with the appropriate method. Advancing pathway analysis interpretation will further enhance the utility of pathway analysis, ultimately propelling progress in systems biology and personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.