Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843750›Full record

ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Optimizing Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Clinical Outcomes.

Arzina Jaffer, Kayleigh Yang, Alisha Ebrahim, Amy N Brown, Ryaan El-Andari, Aleksander Dokollari, Alex J Gregory, Corey Adams, William D T Kent, Ali Fatehi Hassanabad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arzina JafferDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-9060
Kayleigh YangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
Alisha EbrahimDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-5184
Amy N BrownSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
Ryaan El-AndariDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7146-4337
Aleksander DokollariSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-3316
Alex J GregoryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
Corey AdamsSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
William D T KentSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3808-0777
Ali Fatehi HassanabadSection of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0650-0260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based, holistic perioperative recovery protocol intended to improve patient outcomes and decrease postoperative complication rates. While ERAS protocols were first introduced in 1997, specific guidelines for cardiac surgery were not established until 2019. Although the core principles of ERAS remain constant across surgical disciplines, ERAS guidelines for cardiac surgery have remained relatively understudied, likely due to the unique complexities posed by cardiac procedures. Within this comprehensive narrative review, we aimed to explore the current guidelines and evidence for ERAS in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. In non-cardiac surgeries, ERAS has been shown to improve various outcomes, including ICU length of stay, patient satisfaction, and pain management. ERAS for cardiac surgery has also shown encouraging results, including shorter ICU and hospital stays, reduced postoperative opioid use, and faster recovery times. However, there is limited consensus across studies, particularly regarding its impact on morbidity and mortality, with mixed results reported. Furthermore, the limited data on the efficacy of ERAS in minimally invasive cardiac surgeries makes it difficult to establish well-supported guidelines for these procedures. Despite its limitations, the overall outcomes of ERAS for cardiac surgery remain promising. As our understanding and application of ERAS in cardiac surgery continue to evolve, these protocols have the potential to redefine cardiac surgical care standards.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment Outcomecardiac surgeryERASpatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40843750
PMCPMC12371997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.