ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Innovative Strategy for Sustainability Assurance in Orthopedic Surgery.
Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDue to the aging population, orthopedics has become the surgical field with the fastest and greatest growth, and health systems must therefore ensure the sustainable development of this field. The objective of this study is to identify the key areas and the most relevant activities for sustainability assurance in orthopedic surgery, as well as appropriate evaluation tools.
methodsConsisted in designing the key areas for sustainable surgery and evaluating them with the support of new indicators. These areas are based on the most current and relevant practices reported by hospitals around the world. This process was followed by practical validation in an orthopedic hospital.
resultsFour key areas were revealed: rationalization and reduction of consumption, correct separation and recycling of waste, reuse of textiles and equipment, and anesthetics and alternative interventions. The indicators for the evaluation of these areas were developed with the support of results reported in international studies. Each indicator has five levels of fulfilment. Their importance is evaluated on a scale from 1 to 5.
conclusionsThe practical implementation at an orthopedic emergency hospital highlighted the suitability of the indicators within the purpose of the research. Sustaining the values of these changes by surgeons and patients facilitates long-term results and the orientation towards assuring the sustainability of orthopedic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.