ReviewBritish journal of haematology2025
Refining the risk stratification in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A critical analysis of clinical prediction models.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Serum AXL and Gas6 Levels with Clinical Outcomes in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients with Post-Chemotherapy Infection.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Spatial and Topological Features of Tumor Microenvironment in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Hodgkin Lymphoma: A single institution retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Evolution of therapeutic paradigms in Hodgkin lymphoma: from "cure-oriented" to "functional cure".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Nivolumab-AVD versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD as First-Line Treatment for Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound and nomogram model in lymphomas.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Refining the risk stratification in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A critical analysis of clinical prediction models.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a haematological malignancy with high curability; however, prognosis varies significantly based on clinical and biological factors. To enhance risk stratification, several clinical prediction models have been developed over time, particularly for advanced-stage cHL. The International Prognostic Score (IPS), introduced in 1998, was the first widely adopted model, later refined in 2012 (updated IPS) and further simplified in 2015 (IPS-3). Despite their prognostic utility, these models have demonstrated declining predictive performance due to advancements in cHL treatment. In response, the HoLISTIC consortium recently introduced the Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (A-HIPI) in 2023. Unlike previous models, A-HIPI incorporates continuous variables, aiming to provide a more precise risk assessment. However, its applicability to older patients remains uncertain, necessitating further validation studies. Additionally, none of the existing models incorporate dynamic treatment response markers such as interim positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), which have shown strong prognostic value. This review comprehensively discusses the evolution, strengths and limitations of these prediction models, their clinical implications and the necessity for future refinements integrating dynamic biomarkers and treatment response indicators. The integration of machine learning and multi-omics approaches could further enhance risk stratification, improve treatment personalization and optimize patient outcomes in cHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.