Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843624›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2025

Emergence of Medetomidine in the Unregulated Drug Supply and Its Association With Hallucinogenic Effects.

Adams L Sibley, Madigan L Bedard, Samuel Tobias, Brooke A Chidgey, Irina G Phillips, Alice Bell, Nabarun Dasgupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adams L SibleyInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5073-8677
Madigan L BedardSchool of Medicine, Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Samuel TobiasSchool of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-8950
Brooke A ChidgeySchool of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8902-2788
Irina G PhillipsSchool of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Alice BellPrevention Point Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Nabarun DasguptaInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe unregulated drug supply in the United States is rapidly evolving, and veterinary tranquillisers have emerged as adulterants of concern, especially in illicitly-manufactured fentanyl. Following the proliferation of xylazine, medetomidine, a more potent sedative, has recently appeared in multiple US states. This study describes the characteristics of medetomidine samples from a national mail-based drug checking program and aims to determine whether medetomidine is associated with hallucinogenic effects.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 11,363 drug samples between December 2022 and April 2025. Samples were sent voluntarily by people who use drugs. Participant-reported sensations and sample characteristics (e.g., colour, texture) were gathered at point-of-contact. Composition was analysed using gas-chromatography mass spectrometry. We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios for hallucinations in medetomidine-containing samples using generalised estimating equations.

resultsMedetomidine was identified in 278 samples (2.4%), with pronounced growth beginning June 2024. Medetomidine commonly appeared with fentanyl (58.8%) and/or xylazine (55.9%). Most samples were powders (85.3%). Among all 11,363 samples, those containing medetomidine in primary abundance (n = 136) were more likely to be associated with reported hallucinations (17.6%) compared to all other samples (1.2%; adjusted prevalence ratio: 11.95, 95% confidence interval 6.36, 22.44). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsMedetomidine is an emerging adulterant, although its risk profile is under-described. Our findings suggest medetomidine may cause hallucinogenic effects, contradicting clinical use for preventing delirium in postsurgical settings. Unexpected hallucinations may serve as a sentinel signal for medetomidine's presence in local drug markets. Education is needed for people who use drugs and clinicians about novel adverse effects of medetomidine.

Indexed as

Drug ContaminationHallucinationsHallucinogensHypnotics and SedativesIllicit DrugsMedetomidineAdultFemaleFentanylHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesFentanylHallucinogensHypnotics and SedativesIllicit DrugsMedetomidinedrug adulterationdrug checkingfentanylharm reductionxylazine

Identifiers

PMID40843624
PMCPMC12581931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.