ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
A robot arm-assisted acupuncture system with motion and force monitoring: establishment and validation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging physics and biology in acupuncture: flexible multimodal bioelectronics for decoding the deqi microenvironment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- AI-enabled comprehensive patient safety management in acupuncture: from risk identification to continuous quality improvement.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Traditional manual acupuncture faces challenges in quantifying stimulation parameters and preserving techniques consistency. This study presents a robot arm-assisted acupuncture system replicating manual manipulations with precise motion and force monitoring. Methods: System validation was conducted through a Laser Vibrometer to measure multiple frequency-amplitude combinations, followed by comparative analysis between robotic and manual acupuncture manipulations using both motion and force monitoring. Additionally, therapeutic efficacy was evaluated through an adjuvant arthritis rat model, comparing the analgesic effects between robotic and manual acupuncture at the Zusanli acupoint. Results: The Laser Vibrometer validation showed high precision, with mean absolute errors below 0.2 mm across all frequency-amplitude combinations. Comparative analysis demonstrated strong similarity between robotic and manual acupuncture in needle trajectories and force distributions, with Bhattacharyya coefficients of 0.9931 and 0.9976 for Lifting-Inserting and Mountain Burning manipulations. The robotic system achieved analgesic effects comparable to manual acupuncture, significantly improving pain thresholds over control groups. Conclusion: This work lays the groundwork for quantifiable, reproducible acupuncture therapy, driving the development of intelligent devices for standardized clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.