ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Identifying the opportunities and barriers: a cross-sectional review of the health development coordination mechanisms in the World Health Organization African Region.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective health sector coordination is essential to improve the implementation of development and humanitarian response programmes in the WHO African Region. In recent years, multiple efforts have been deployed to strengthen coordination mechanisms, with uneven progress depending on the national context. Nevertheless, important challenges remain. In many cases, mechanisms remain fragmented, coordination platforms often operate in isolation, and resources are not always used efficiently. In certain settings, current cooperation models may hinder the long-term sustainability of progress, and there is a need to foster greater synergy among the actors involved. Strengthening national capacities and promoting coordination that better responds to realities on the ground therefore remain critical priorities on the continent. While several studies have assessed coordination mechanisms in individual countries, a regional overview has been lacking. This study thus aimed to examine the current status and characteristics of health sector coordination mechanisms and the role of WHO in health coordination across the 47 member states of the WHO African Region. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between 2017 and 2019 using a mixed-methods approach, including document reviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. The findings revealed that only 9 member states (23%) had a functioning central health sector coordination platform, all of which had signed the IHP + compact and adopted the Sector-Wide Approach. Nearly half (47%) lacked a central platform, despite 41% hosting a significant number of development partners and 36% having signed the IHP+. Sixteen member states (34%) operated multiple fragmented, programme-specific coordination mechanisms with minimal linkage to any overarching platform, despite most of them (81%) being IHP + signatories. In eight member states, parallel humanitarian and development coordination systems coexisted. Coordination was identified by stakeholders as one of the top five priorities for WHO support. Based on these findings, five key recommendations are proposed: strengthening national coordination capacities; streamlining multiple coordination mechanisms; addressing coordination challenges in protracted crisis settings; clearly defining WHO's coordination role in line with partner expectations; and providing context-specific support across core health system functions. Collective efforts from all stakeholders are essential to accelerate the implementation of these recommendations, thereby enhancing health governance, improving aid effectiveness, and advancing progress towarduniversal health coverage in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.