ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluation and analysis of theoretical knowledge proficiency and practical skills among parasitic disease practitioners in Hainan province: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate both theoretical knowledge proficiency and practical skills among practitioners specializing in parasitic diseases in Hainan province, providing essential groundwork for ongoing capacity enhancement efforts. Methods: A cross-sectional study using two-stage stratified random sampling was conducted in Hainan province. City or county-level representatives from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other institutes, as well as medical institutions focusing on parasitic diseases, participated in this subnational assessment process. They were evaluated across several key areas, including theoretical knowledge, smear sample examination, and microscopic identification, with a specific focus on Result: A total of 54 county-level representatives participated in this study, with 23 from 41 CDCs and 31 from medical institutes. Significant differences were observed in theoretical knowledge scores across various parasitic species ( Conclusion: These findings underscore an ongoing necessity to bolster both theoretical understanding and skill proficiencies related to parasitic diseases-particularly in malaria blood smear analysis, detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.