Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843407›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

Comparison of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Peerapon Sangthong, Nattapong Binsri, Sarayut Kanjanatarayon, Weerayut Wiriyabanditkul, Thanisorn Pattanasuwon, Satit Siriboonrid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peerapon SangthongDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattapong BinsriDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sarayut KanjanatarayonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Weerayut WiriyabanditkulDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanisorn PattanasuwonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Satit SiriboonridDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the clinical outcome of high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT). Materials and Methods: Patients were classified as high-risk prostate cancer and received definitive treatment between 2013 and 2023. Patients with previous pelvic RT and incomplete medical record were excluded. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (MFS). The secondary outcomes were factors for progression and metastasis. Results: Of 244 patients analyzed (89 RP and 155 RT); the estimated 10-year PFS was 49.9% in the RP and 75.5% in the RT ( Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that RT offers superiority over RP in PFS, whereas distant metastasis was similar.

Indexed as

High-risk prostate cancerradical prostatectomyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40843407
PMCPMC12366844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.