ReviewUrology annals
Predictive tools and scoring systems for surgical intervention in antenatal hydronephrosis and pelviureteric junction obstruction: An ATLAS based on comprehensive review of literature.
Review in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy in emergency settings: A comparative study of conservative therapy and renal drainage.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Evolving paradigms in endourology - Toward precision, patient-centeredness, and sustainability.Urology annalsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antenatal hydronephrosis (ANH) is detected in up to 5% of pregnancies and is most commonly caused by pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). While many cases resolve spontaneously, subset of patients require surgical intervention. Differentiating between these groups remains a clinical challenge, often leading to unnecessary investigations or delayed treatment. Numerous scoring systems and predictive tools have been developed to support risk stratification, yet none have achieved universal adoption. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and tools designed to predict the need for surgical intervention in patients with ANH or confirmed PUJO. Search terms included variations of "PUJO," "prognosis," "predictor," and "surgery." Included studies described original tools or external validation of models using radiological parameters to stratify risk. Each tool was appraised for input parameters, derivation methodology, outcome definitions, external validation, and clinical applicability. Nine predictive tools were identified, all based on imaging data, with one incorporating machine learning (ML). Eight of nine tools aimed to predict the need for pyeloplasty. Four tools have undergone some form of external validation. Most tools used numerical scores, one applied a visual grading system, and another used a nonpercentage-based ML approach. While several demonstrated high predictive accuracy, limitations included retrospective design, small sample sizes, subjective imaging interpretation, and lack of consistent surgical outcome definitions. Despite growing interest and several promising models, no tool has yet been externally validated in large, diverse prospective cohorts. Further research is needed to develop clinically robust, generalizable tools for early risk stratification in ANH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.