ArticleUrology annals
Urological education in Saudi Arabia medical schools: Where are we now and how can we do better? A cross-sectional study.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Urology is a part of healthcare known as surgical specialty that deals with different diseases of male and female urinary system and male reproductive organs. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the urological education in Saudi Arabia medical schools and assess medical students' knowledge and preference. Methodology: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia targeted clinical years' medical students from all regions, using a validated questionnaire to collect demographic, academic, and urology specialty knowledge, attitudes, and reasons for not choosing a specialty. The questionnaire was distributed through social media until no more answers were obtained. Results: A study of 216 students in Saudi Arabia found that 58.8% were male, with 107 in their 5 Conclusion and Recommendations: The study revealed that medical students lack knowledge and interest in the urology specialty, leading to low career preference. The frequency of rotations is insufficient, and more exposure is needed. Most students believe urology rotation should be the part of medical school curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.