ArticleUrology annals
Analysis of outcome of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft and vaginal wall graft for female urethral stricture.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It was estimated that 3%-8% of women presented with bladder obstruction, and 4%-13% of these women had female urethral stricture (FUS), which is an uncommon disorder. Aims: The study has been conducted to analyze the outcome of Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and vaginal wall graft (VWG) for FUS. Settings and Design: It was a retrospective, single-centric cohort study. The study has been conducted for 2 years and 2 months, i.e., from July 2021 to September 2023. Subjects and Methods: The study included 20 female patients with urethral stricture who had urethroplasty. The participants were further classified into two groups respectively. One of the groups included 10 participants with cases of BMG urethroplasty and another 10 were cases of VWG urethroplasty. Statistical Analysis: The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 program was used to analyze the data. Both continuous and categorical variables were present in the data. Descriptive Statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or Results: The BMG group had a substantially lower postvoid residual (PVR) of 10 ± 4.2 mL than the VWG group, which had a PVR of 15 ± 6.4 mL with a Conclusion: The study concluded that FUS reconstruction can offer a good, long-lasting response. Moreover, between both the preferred techniques of BMG and VWG urethroplasty, which is safe and effective, patients with postmenopausal atrophy or vaginal pathology may benefit more from BMG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.