Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843383›Full record

ArticleSchool mental health2024

Redesigning an Autism Evidence-Based Practice Adoption and Decision-Making Implementation Toolkit for Middle and High Schools.

Jill J Locke, Olivia G Michael, Tana Holt, Amy Drahota, Kelsey S Dickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in School mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jill J LockeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74 Street, Box 354920, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-8509
Olivia G MichaelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74 Street, Box 354920, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3074-6252
Tana HoltDepartment of Child and Family Development, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3440-8296
Amy DrahotaDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1169-3546
Kelsey S DicksonDepartment of Child and Family Development, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-4377

Funding

Redesigning an Autism Evidence-Based Practice Implementation Toolkit for Middle and High Schools- Administrative SupplementR21MH130793 · NIMH · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DICKSON, KELSEY S, LOCKE, JILL J · 2022 to 2023
$521k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH130793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research indicates inadequate evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation for autistic adolescents in schools, despite schools being the most accessed service system by autistic youth. It is critical for school personnel to have a systematic approach to select and adopt autism EBPs. The Autism Community Toolkit: Systems to Measure and Adopt Research-based Treatments (ACT SMART) is a packaged implementation process tool designed to facilitate autism EBP adoption and uptake in community agencies, with promising feasibility, utility, and effectiveness. The current study describes the first iterative study of a community-partnered, iterative redesign of ACT SMART for use in educational settings. Using mixed-methods (focus groups, surveys), we gathered district and school administrators', teachers', paraeducators', autistic students' and their caregivers' perspectives of the feasibility, usability, and appropriateness of ACT SMART. We also gathered recommendations for redesign to ensure its contextual appropriateness and usability in middle and high schools. Results indicated the perceived acceptability (satisfaction with ACT SMART), feasibility (practicability of ACT SMART), and appropriateness (perceived fit or relevance of ACT SMART) but more limited usability (extent to which ACT SMART can be used by educators to achieve intended goals) of ACT SMART for schools. Key modifications include integrating the toolkit with school structures (i.e., conducting training on professional development days, aligning budget planning with the district timeline, tying the toolkit to students' IEPs, aligning with school calendars) and content modifications (i.e., altering language, shortening assessments, incorporating toolkit engagement strategies) to improve usability in schools. The current study highlights the relevance and potential of tools targeting EBP selection and adoption support for public schools. Next steps include further application of community-partnered and human-centered design methods to further refine and finalize the redesigned ACT SMART Toolkit and subsequent feasibility pilot testing.

Indexed as

AdoptionAutismDecision-makingEvidence-based practicesImplementation

Identifiers

PMID40843383
PMCPMC12366645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.