ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Clinical use and toxicities of bortezomib in pediatric patients: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are FDA-approved to treat adult malignancies. The PI, Bortezomib (BTZ), has been used off-label in pediatric patients but its safety profile in these patients has yet to be systematically assessed. We sought to review the pediatric safety profile of BTZ based on published clinical articles which we compared to publicly available adult safety data from the BTZ drug insert. Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched up through September 2024. We included published clinical studies that reported adverse events (AEs) which included clinical trials, clinical studies (>10 patients), and clinical series/case reports (≤10 patients). Extracted pediatric safety data was compared to reported adult safety profile from the BTZ drug insert. Results: There was heterogeneity in reporting of different AEs and not all categories were comparable to published adult AEs.any studies were small case series or reports which did not allow for more quantitative analysis. Nevertheless, we found that pediatric patients treated with BTZ reported lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy and gastrointestinal toxicity compared to adults. Rates of bone marrow suppression and infection in pediatrics were comparable to or higher than those observed in adults These incidences were comparable or lower when pediatric patients with leukemia were excluded. Discussion: BTZ has an acceptable safety profile for use in pediatric patients. Antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis should be considered given the high rate of infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.