ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Durability and effectiveness of dual vs. triple therapy and tablet simplification in ART: findings from the Italian MOSAICO study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Treatment optimization in people with HIV (PWH) has increasingly focused on reducing drug burden and improving regimen simplicity. However, comparative real-world evidence on dual therapy (DT) vs. triple therapy (TT), and single-tablet regimens (STR) vs. multi-tablet regimens (MTR), remains limited. Methods: The MOSAICO study is a multicenter, retrospective observational analysis conducted across 20 centers, including people with HIV on a stable virological suppression who switched antiretroviral therapy between 2017 and 2019. People were followed-up up to 48 months post-switch. Comparative analyses assessed virological suppression (HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL), CD4 Results: Four hundred ninety-one PWH were included. Both DT and triple therapy groups maintained high levels of virological suppression over 48 months (12 months: 97.1% vs. 91.6%; 24 months: 100% vs. 95.6%; 36 months: 100% vs. 96.9%; 48 months: 100% vs. 100%). From 24 months onward, all persons living with HIV remaining on their respective regimens achieved full virological suppression. Immunological recovery (CD4 Discussion: The real-world effectiveness of both dual and triple therapies when tailored to appropriate person profiles. STRs offer enhanced long-term persistence compared to MTRs, supporting treatment simplification strategies. These results reinforce the importance of individualized treatment approaches balancing clinical effectiveness with person-centered considerations such as pill burden and tolerability. Limitations include the retrospective design and the lack of quality-of-life data, which may affect interpretation of patient-centered outcomes. Future efforts should expand access to dual-agent STR to further improve Antiretroviral Therapy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.