ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2025
Examination of osteosarcopenia in patients over 65 years old with hip fracture.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThere is limited knowledge regarding the clinical, biochemical, and functional characteristics of patients with osteosarcopenia. The present study aims to explore the presence of osteosarcopenia in patients aged 65 years and over who have a history of falls and hip fractures.
methodsSeventy-six participants (77.6% women) aged 65 years and over (mean age 81±6.75 years) were admitted to the orthopedic clinic of our hospital due to hip fracture. The diagnosis of osteopenia/osteoporosis was established based on the bone mineral density measurement using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The SARC-F scale was used to screen patients for sarcopenia. The muscle mass was determined by the appendicular lean mass (ALM). The muscle strength was evaluated by the handgrip strength. SPSS for Windows 25.0 (IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software package was used in the statistical analysis of the study data.
resultsA total of 76 patients were evaluated, including 59 (77.6%) females and 17 (22.4%) males. The mean age of the patients was 81±6.75 years. The prevalence of osteosarcopenia in the entire study group was 36.8%. The prevalence rate was higher in males (59%) than in females (30.5%) (p<0.05). The ALM and the handgrip strength were lower in patients with osteosarcopenia (p<0.05). The mean body weight, total fat mass, fat mass index, and upper arm circumference were the lowest in the group of patients with osteosarcopenia (p<0.05).
conclusionThe present study found that the prevalence of osteosarcopenia was higher in patients with hip fracture. There is a limited number of studies in literature directly evaluating the relationship between osteosarcopenia and hip fracture. The presence of osteosarcopenia is often overlooked when the bone fracture is the prevailing clinical condition. Osteosarcopenia is frequently the accompanying diagnosis in patients with hip fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.