ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2025
Contextual reading and analysis of the team's narratives about the system in which clinical education and healthcare processes are experienced.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUnderstanding the health system and the clinical and learning experiences from the perspective of complexity theory requires a reflective and contextual approach. The context in which experience takes place consists of multidimensional elements that influence each other, such as sociocultural environment, work/educational climate, stakeholders, educational/healthcare system. In this framework, it is important to read and analyze the parties' experiential narratives within their contexts. The aim of this study is to analyze the narratives of the team working in a surgical clinic about their clinical education and healthcare experiences in terms of the "institutional, clinical and national system" as one of the contextual elements in which the experience is lived. In line with this purpose, the research problems were identified as follows: (1) what are the experiences and narratives of the team regarding the system in clinical education and healthcare processes, (2) how do the parties relate to the system, and (3) what are the outcomes of different ways of relating?
methodsThis narrative study was conducted in the surgical clinic of a university hospital. The voluntary participant group consisted of 31 participants, including clinical instructors (n=5), surgical residency students (n=5), medical students/interns (n=15) and nurses (n=6) working as a team in the clinic. The narratives obtained through in-depth interviews were analyzed using the "Three-Stage Contextual Theme Analysis" created for this study.
resultsThe themes that emerged from the analysis were grouped under three contextual categories: "clinical system: structure, functioning and workload", "clinical environment, climate and culture", "national, social environment and extra challenging situations". The themes related to the consequences of these contextual experiences were grouped under two categories: "ways of coping/not coping" and "consequences/effects".
conclusionThe contextual dimension of the experience can cause parties to live experiences in their own way and to focus more on their context and not see enough of what others experience. This points to the importance of planning, conducting and evaluating clinical education, research and healthcare processes within their context, including the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.