ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025
Development of Benchmark Curves to Early Detect Health-Related Productivity Deviations Using Production Indicators in Swine Nursery and Finishing Lots.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nursery and finishing phases are critical for profitability and sustainability in swine production, but effective methods for early disease detection in these stages remain underdeveloped. This study used routinely collected production indicators from nursery (42-56 days postfarrowing) and finishing lots (115-120 days postfarrowing) to create production benchmark curves for anomaly detection. These curves were developed for farms without diagnosed health challenges and compared to those with diagnosed health issues, based on tissue submissions and diagnostic codes (Dx codes). Statistical methods such as resampling techniques, Bayesian statistics, and standard deviation (SD) thresholds were employed to build the benchmark curves. The main objective was to test and compare the benchmarks using detection, early detection rate (EDR), time-to-detect (TTD), and false positive rate (FPR). Results showed that bootstrapping (BOOT), jackknife (JK), and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods provided the highest EDRs, although they were prone to false positives. For nursery lots, it was observed that using cumulative average with one SD for feed disappearance (EDR 49.2% and FPR 9.8%) and estimated weight (EDR 47.2% and FPR 8.8%) showed the best balance between EDR and FPR, and using MCMC for mortality showed the best balance between EDR and FPR (EDR 38.8% and FPR 13.8%). For finishing lots, using cumulative average with one SD showed a more balanced performance with FPR below 14.0% and EDR of 21.3% for feed disappearance, 67.4% weight, and 59.7% for mortality. These findings demonstrate the potential of using production indicators for early health challenge detection in swine operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.