Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843277›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025

Development of Benchmark Curves to Early Detect Health-Related Productivity Deviations Using Production Indicators in Swine Nursery and Finishing Lots.

Mafalda Pedro Mil-Homens, Ximena Paz Portal, Edison Magalhaes, Tyler Holck, Joel Stave, Jordan Gebhardt, Eduardo Costa, Derald Holtkamp, Fernanda Dórea, Chong Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mafalda Pedro Mil-HomensDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1172-9441
Ximena Paz PortalHanor Company, Enid, Oklahoma, USA.
Edison MagalhaesDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Tyler HolckDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Joel StavePrairie Systems, Spencer, Iowa, USA.
Jordan GebhardtDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-6714
Eduardo CostaDepartment of Epidemiology, Bio-informatics, and Animal Models, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-0800
Derald HoltkampDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-4733
Fernanda DóreaSwedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8638-8525
Chong WangDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4489-4344
Giovani TrevisanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-526X
Daniel LinharesDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-9942
Gustavo SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-8803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nursery and finishing phases are critical for profitability and sustainability in swine production, but effective methods for early disease detection in these stages remain underdeveloped. This study used routinely collected production indicators from nursery (42-56 days postfarrowing) and finishing lots (115-120 days postfarrowing) to create production benchmark curves for anomaly detection. These curves were developed for farms without diagnosed health challenges and compared to those with diagnosed health issues, based on tissue submissions and diagnostic codes (Dx codes). Statistical methods such as resampling techniques, Bayesian statistics, and standard deviation (SD) thresholds were employed to build the benchmark curves. The main objective was to test and compare the benchmarks using detection, early detection rate (EDR), time-to-detect (TTD), and false positive rate (FPR). Results showed that bootstrapping (BOOT), jackknife (JK), and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods provided the highest EDRs, although they were prone to false positives. For nursery lots, it was observed that using cumulative average with one SD for feed disappearance (EDR 49.2% and FPR 9.8%) and estimated weight (EDR 47.2% and FPR 8.8%) showed the best balance between EDR and FPR, and using MCMC for mortality showed the best balance between EDR and FPR (EDR 38.8% and FPR 13.8%). For finishing lots, using cumulative average with one SD showed a more balanced performance with FPR below 14.0% and EDR of 21.3% for feed disappearance, 67.4% weight, and 59.7% for mortality. These findings demonstrate the potential of using production indicators for early health challenge detection in swine operations.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBenchmarkingSwine DiseasesAnimalsBayes TheoremSwineBayesian statisticsbenchmarkingnursery and finishingresampling techniquessurveillanceswine

Identifiers

PMID40843277
PMCPMC12367395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.