Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843240›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025

Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Dermoscopy: Game Changers.

Hana I Nazir, Kathleen E Daly, Elizabeth V Seiverling, Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Kendall L Buchanan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hana I NazirDr. Nazir, Ms. Daly, and Dr. Buchanan are with the Department of Dermatology at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia.
Kathleen E DalyDr. Nazir, Ms. Daly, and Dr. Buchanan are with the Department of Dermatology at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia.
Elizabeth V SeiverlingDr. Seiverling is with the Department of Dermatology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cristian Navarrete-DechentDr. Navarrete-Dechent is with the Department of Dermatology at the Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile in Santiago, Chile.
Kendall L BuchananDr. Nazir, Ms. Daly, and Dr. Buchanan are with the Department of Dermatology at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraviolet-induced fluorescence dermoscopy (UVFD) is a novel diagnostic and visualization technique that enhances visualization of skin dermatoses with ultraviolet (UV) light. UVFD has been used to diagnose dermatoses including bacterial and fungal infections, pigmentary disorders, and skin neoplasms. We present five cases-pitted keratolysis, porokeratosis, molluscum, biopsy site identification, and lentigo maligna-where UVFD alone, compared to traditional polarized dermoscopy (PD) or the unaided clinical exam, served as a "game-changer" in diagnosis and management. Polarized and UV images were captured using a DL5 dermatoscope coupled to a smartphone. In the cases of pitted keratolysis, porokeratosis, and molluscum, we highlight distinct patterns of fluorescence that were readily visualized with UVFD and aided efficient diagnosis, in contrast with more subtle features that were seen under PD. We also demonstrate the utility of UVFD in identification and confirmation of a prior biopsy site in a patient who presented for excision of a skin cancer. Finally, we describe the advantage of UVFD in presurgical margin delineation in a patient with lentigo maligna. In these cases, we show that UVFD facilitates prompt and accurate diagnosis, streamlines appropriate treatment, and has the capacity to reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies. Given the convenience and practicality of a dermatoscope equipped with a UV light, we propose that clinicians would benefit from the use of UVFD as a supplementary tool alongside conventional dermoscopy, rather than as a substitute.

Indexed as

biopsyDermoscopydiagnosisskin cancersurgeryultraviolet-induced fluorescence dermoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40843240
PMCPMC12367246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.