ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Impact of Microencapsulated Benzoyl Peroxide on the Skin Microbiome and Clinical Outcomes in Rosacea: An Update on a Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover, Vehicle-controlled Clinical Trial.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to evaluate changes in skin microbiome biodiversity and correlation with rosacea improvement of microencapsulated benzoyl peroxide (E-BPO) versus vehicle cream in rosacea patients in a 12-week crossover study with a no-treatment period of four weeks (Week 16).
methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, single-center, crossover, vehicle-controlled evaluation of E-BPO on the skin microbiome in rosacea. Thirty-one participants had facial rosacea with global severity of 3 or 4 on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scale. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. The E-BPO/vehicle group applied E-BPO for eight weeks, then vehicle for four weeks. The vehicle/E-BPO group applied vehicle for eight weeks, then E-BPO for four weeks. Clinical assessments were performed using IGA, inflammatory rosacea scale, and erythema scale. Determination of change in skin microbiome was based on facial swab sampling.
resultsShifts in the microbiome correlated with improvements in IGA, inflammatory rosacea, and erythema. At Week 8, similar bacterial species diversity profiles were observed among all participants. After crossover of the vehicle/E-BPO group at eight weeks to E-BPO, the relative abundance of LIMITATIONS: The study had a short duration, which may not fully capture the long-term effects and durability of E-BPO in real-world clinical practice.
conclusionEven after withdrawal at 16 weeks, efficacy and shifts in the skin microbiome were maintained over the duration of the study period with demonstrated clinical improvement and a well-tolerated safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40843233PMC12367243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.