ArticleSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
Survival and Outcome of Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma According to the Central Nervous System-International Prognostic Index.
Article in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical, Biological, and Treatment-Related Predictors of Central Nervous System Relapse in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Several prognostic scores exist in DLBCL, including the International Prognostic Index (IPI). More recently, a modification of the IPI that estimates the risk of progression to the central nervous system (CNS-IPI) was published. Whether the CNS-IPI index is sufficient to prognosticate DLBCL survival is yet untested. Objectives: We aim to describe the outcomes of DLBCL patients based on CNS-IPI risk groups. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all DLBCL cases diagnosed from January 2015 until April 2022 at an academic tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. CNS-IPI was calculated at the time of diagnosis. The outcomes were compared between two CNS-IPI risk categories: low and intermediate/high-risk groups. Logrank method was used to calculate Results: A total of 136 patients were included (median age: 56.5 years), of which 38 (28%) died: 5 in the low-risk group and 33 in the intermediate/high-risk group. Low-risk and intermediate/high-risk CNS-IPI were found in 41 (30%) and 95 (70%) patients, respectively. The median survival in the low-risk and intermediate/high-risk CNS-IPI groups was 66 months [95% CI: 60-not-reached (NR)] and NR (95% CI: 24-NR) ( Conclusion: The risk of progression to the central nervous system was moderate in our diffuse large B-cell lymphoma population. Patients with intermediate/high-risk CNS-IPI had worse survival compared with low-risk patients. The CNS-IPI was found to a good model to not only estimate the risk of disease progression to the central nervous system but also overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.