ArticleSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
Nalbuphine as a Potential Alternative to Morphine in Sickle Cell Disease Patients with Vaso-occlusive Crisis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Allergic reaction to nalbuphine administration in a pre-adolescent patient: a case report and literature review.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of morphine in managing vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) can result in significant side effects. Nalbuphine, a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid, may offer an alternative with fewer complications. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine and morphine in pain management among adult SCD patients presenting with VOC. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with SCD treated at King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia, between 2019 and 2023. Patients were classified into two groups (receiving morphine and nalbuphine). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 1-h, 6-h, and 24-h post-administration. Additional outcomes included the need for rescue medication and discharge rates from the emergency department. Results: A total of 234 patients were included (morphine: 120; nalbuphine: 114). The mean age of the cohort was 30.5 ± 8.7 years, and 63.8% were female. Baseline laboratory data indicated mean hemoglobin of 8.5 g/dL and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (576.9 U/L). At 6 h, 10% and 20% of patients on morphine and nalbuphine, respectively, reported no pain ( Conclusion: Nalbuphine can be a potential alternative for vaso-occlusive crisis pain management in sickle cell disease patients, as it demonstrated superior efficacy compared with morphine, especially at later time points, with reduced need for rescue medication and earlier discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.