Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843179›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative methods

"We Have a Ways to Go, but I Think You've Taken the Steps to Get Us There": Engaging Community Partners in Qualitative Analysis Using the RADaR Technique.

Analay Perez, Alexandra E Harper, M Miaisha Mitchell, Daphne C Watkins, Linda Cottler, Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, Susan L Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Analay PerezDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan.
Alexandra E HarperMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan.
M Miaisha MitchellGreater Frenchtown Area Governor's Revitalization Council, Inc., Tallahassee, FL.
Daphne C WatkinsSchool of Social Work, University of Michigan.
Linda CottlerDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida.
Sergio Aguilar-GaxiolaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Reducing Health Disparities and Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California, Davis.
Susan L MurphyMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UM1TR004404 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Julie C Lumeng · 2023 to 2026
$39.8M
Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
15/24- Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055358 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GURKA, KELLY K., SCOTT, LISA S. · 2021 to 2023
$3.7M
Training Promotoras/Community Health Workers using Culturally and Linguistically-Appropriate Research Best PracticesU01TR003409 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AGUILAR-GAXIOLA, SERGIO A., COTTLER, LINDA B. · 2020 to 2023
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR003409NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004404NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-engaged research is an approach that helps foster partnerships between community members and researchers by incorporating community members across multiple stages of the research study. In doing so, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the insider perspective. One area that has received limited attention is the process of engaging community members in qualitative data analysis. To overcome this limitation, we outline how we implemented and adapted the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction (RADaR) technique to explore learners' perceptions and experiences of a tailored research best practices training for Community Health Workers and Promotoras. We reflect on the strengths and challenges of using the RADaR technique in community-engaged research and provide a list of considerations for researchers engaging in a similar process. We also incorporate the community partner's perspectives on engaging in qualitative data analysis. This article provides a step-by-step approach for engaging community partners in the qualitative data analysis process, particularly using the RADaR technique, as a strategy for enhancing research quality and mitigating the power imbalance between researchers and communities.

Indexed as

community-engaged researchCommunity Health WorkersPromotorasqualitative analysisRADaRRigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction

Identifiers

PMID40843179
PMCPMC12365954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.