Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843159›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health2025

Digital Platforms and Educational Tools for Enhancing Menstrual Health: A Scoping Review.

Samantha Jimenez, Austin Lent, Sahar Kaleem, Nada Eldawy, Jennifer Mendonca, Madison Etzel, Paige Brinzo, Sara Burgoa, Yasmine Zerrouki, Tiffany Follin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Samantha JimenezCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Austin LentCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Sahar KaleemCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Nada EldawyCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Jennifer MendoncaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Madison EtzelCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Paige BrinzoCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Sara BurgoaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Yasmine ZerroukiCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Tiffany FollinCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Maria MejiaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Panagiota KitsantasCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Lea SaccaCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Menstruating individuals have the right to access proper menstrual health education and hygiene practices. However, many of these individuals experience period poverty, which is defined as the lack of access to safe and hygienic menstrual products, basic sanitation services, adequate waste disposal systems, and menstrual hygiene education. Although the negative effects of period poverty on the physical, social, and mental well-being of menstruating adolescents have been emphasized and reported as a major public health issue, there remains a gap in research exploring the impact of evidence-based digital menstrual health educational tools on improving overall health outcomes and mental well-being of menstruating individuals. This scoping review aims to address this gap in period poverty and menstrual health research by exploring the availability of online educational intervention and digital platforms on menstrual health. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was utilized as a reference checklist for this study. The Arksey and O'Malley Framework was used to guide the methodology for this review. The Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations were used for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results for the review. Results: After a full study review, seven studies were retained for analysis. The majority of the barriers were classified into the "Study design and methodological issues" ( Conclusion: Findings from this review will provide recommendations and inform future implementation and broader dissemination of such platforms for further improvement of menstrual health outcomes.

Indexed as

digital platformdisseminationmenstrual equityMenstrual healthsocial media

Identifiers

PMID40843159
PMCPMC12366815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.