ArticleInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health2025
Male Responses to Female Partners with Genitopelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: A Systematic Review of Biopsychological Impacts and Coping Strategies.
Article in International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthy relationships rely on emotional, physical, and sexual connections, but genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) can render intimacy difficult for affected couples. This condition also affects the psychological and sexual well-being of male partners, which frequently leads to feelings of rejection and frustration that can further strain relationships. To effectively support couples, understanding how male partners are impacted by and cope with their partner's GPPPD, the focus of this study, is crucial. Methods: This study conducted a systematic review of the literature published up to 2024 across nine databases to identify studies on male sexual dysfunction related to female partners with GPPPD. Studies that focused on male responses to GPPPD, excluding reviews and theoretical articles, were considered eligible. Data were extracted and assessed using PRISMA guidelines and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies (ROBINS-E) tool, focusing on outcomes such as sexual dysfunction, mental health, relationship satisfaction, and effort to seek solutions among male partners. Results: Conducted between 2008 and 2020 in several countries, primarily from the Middle East, these studies involved approximately 2,485 couples. The results highlighted that male partners of women with GPPPD frequently experience significant sexual dissatisfaction and dysfunction, including issues such as premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, and hypoactive sexual desire. These challenges typically lead biological, psychological, and social impacts. We also observed no significant differentiation across cultures, social values, or generations. Conclusion: The review identified three major responses and effects of GPPPD among men, including personal and relational tension that contribute to mental and sexual disorders; however, men frequently actively seek help and adopt coping strategies instead of passively accepting the situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.