ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Out of hospital cardiac arrest in STEMI patients: A six-year review of an Irish tertiary referral centre.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) can complicate ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with a tenfold increase in mortality compared to those presenting without cardiac arrest. This study aimed to characterise STEMI patients presenting with OHCA to a single centre and to investigate the factors affecting their outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients on the National Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Register that presented over a six-year period with OHCA. The hospital's electronic health record was used to collect data on baseline characteristics, STEMI diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. Results: There were 478 OHCA presentations; 75 (16 %) were diagnosed with STEMI. Mortality rates were significantly lower amongst the STEMI patients (23 % vs 87 %). There was no significant difference in the characteristics of STEMI patients transferred directly to the coronary catheterisation lab (CCL) and initially treated in ED. Over 90 % of STEMI patients were successfully treated with PCI. Mortality was higher in STEMI patients that were initially transferred to ED, with this factor identified as an independent predictor of mortality. However, transfer to CCL after two hours was not associated with increased mortality, when compared to those transferred within an hour of hospital arrival. Conclusion: Mortality rates amongst studied STEMI patients presenting with OHCA were high. Although transfer to ED was associated with increased mortality, this finding may be explained by confounding factors, including more profound haemodynamic instability precluding STEMI diagnosis, and/or requiring transfer to ED for stabilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.