Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843145›Full record

ArticleInformation (Basel)2025

Multi-Modal Fusion of Routine Care Electronic Health Records (EHR): A Scoping Review.

Zina Ben-Miled, Jacob A Shebesh, Jing Su, Paul R Dexter, Randall W Grout, Malaz A Boustani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Information (Basel), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zina Ben-MiledPhillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lamar University, Cherry Building, Beaumont, TX 77705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-0368
Jacob A ShebeshDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis, 723 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Jing SuIndiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, 340 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Paul R DexterIndiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, 340 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Randall W GroutIndiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, 340 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Malaz A BoustaniIndiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, 340 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-677X

Funding

Digital Detection of Dementia Studies (D cubed Studies).R01AG069765 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BEN-MILED, ZINA, BOUSTANI, MALAZ · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electronic health records (EHR) are now widely available in healthcare institutions to document the medical history of patients as they interact with healthcare services. In particular, routine care EHR data are collected for a large number of patients. These data span multiple heterogeneous elements (i.e., demographics, diagnosis, medications, clinical notes, vital signs, and laboratory results) which contain semantic, concept, and temporal information. Recent advances in generative learning techniques were able to leverage the fusion of multiple routine care EHR data elements to enhance clinical decision support. Objective: A scoping review of the proposed techniques including fusion architectures, input data elements, and application areas is needed to synthesize variances and identify research gaps that can promote re-use of these techniques for new clinical outcomes. Design: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Google Scholar to identify high impact fusion architectures over multi-modal routine care EHR data during the period 2018 to 2023. The guidelines from the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for scoping review were followed. The findings were derived from the selected studies using a thematic and comparative analysis. Results: The scoping review revealed the lack of standard definition for EHR data elements as they are transformed into input modalities. These definitions ignore one or more key characteristics of the data including source, encoding scheme, and concept level. Moreover, in order to adapt to emergent generative learning techniques, the classification of fusion architectures should distinguish fusion from learning and take into consideration that learning can concurrently happen in all three layers of new fusion architectures (i.e., encoding, representation, and decision). These aspects constitute the first step towards a streamlined approach to the design of multi-modal fusion architectures for routine care EHR data. In addition, current pretrained encoding models are inconsistent in their handling of temporal and semantic information thereby hindering their re-use for different applications and clinical settings. Conclusions: Current routine care EHR fusion architectures mostly follow a design-by-example methodology. Guidelines are needed for the design of efficient multi-modal models for a broad range of healthcare applications. In addition to promoting re-use, these guidelines need to outline best practices for combining multiple modalities while leveraging transfer learning and co-learning as well as semantic and temporal encoding.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsmachine learningmodalitymulti-modal fusiontransformers

Identifiers

PMID40843145
PMCPMC12366745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.