ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Cutoff Score Determination of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Recreationally Active Individuals.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05977660 (Cross-cultural Adaptation and Cut-off Score Determination of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Cut-off Score Determination of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-TR)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adaptation studies have evaluated ankle instability (AI) across various cultures and sports. Purpose/Hypothesis: The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a valid patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the presence and severity of AI. The current study aimed to adapt the CAIT to the Turkish language, test its psychometric properties, and determine cutoff scores in a Turkish population with AI compared with observations in their healthy counterparts. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: To evaluate the Turkish version of the CAIT (CAIT-TR), data obtained from 236 recreationally active participants with and without AI were examined. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, cutoff score, and ceiling and floor effects were assessed. Results: The test-retest reliability of the CAIT-TR was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.968 and 0.978 for the right and left ankles, respectively. Cronbach α values for the CAIT-TR were calculated as 0.855 and 0.852 for the right and left ankles, respectively. The discriminative ability and cutoff score of the CAIT-TR were determined by defining the receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the Youden index for the left and right ankles (0.579 and 0.551, respectively), with a cutoff score of 23.5 and threshold of ≤23. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the CAIT-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the presence and severity of AI in recreationally active Turkish-speaking individuals. These data should help in providing a practical assessment tool for care in this population. Registration: NCT05977660 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.