ArticleCureus2025
Reappraisal of Alternative Treatments for Non-melanoma Skin Cancers on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSocial media plays a significant role in patient education as many US Internet users obtain health information online. YouTube is a popular search engine among people looking for dermatologic advice. Our study assesses the content on homeopathic remedies for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) available on YouTube.
methodsWe searched YouTube in a private browsing tab for "natural skin cancer remedies," "alternative skin cancer treatment," and "holistic skin cancer treatment" in separate searches. The top 40 videos meeting inclusion criteria in each search were analyzed. For data extraction, the video characteristics, engagement metrics and content themes were recorded. Duplicates were removed.
results61 videos were analyzed in total. 22 (36.1%) of the videos were created by homeopathic YouTube channels, 20 (32.8%) by laypeople and/or influencers, 11 (18%) by physicians and pharmacists, 4 (6.7%) by news channels, and 4 (6.7%) by other personnel. The 10 most frequently mentioned remedies included green tea (n=12, 19.7%), turmeric/curcumin (n=12, 19.7%), coconut oil (n=9, 14.8%), black salve (n=7, 11.5%), apple cider vinegar (n=7, 11.5%), baking soda (n=7, 11.5%), garlic (n=7, 11.5%), frankincense oil (n=6, 9.8%), eggplant (n=6, 9.8%), and milk thistle (n=6, 9.8%). DISCUSSION: Although most videos were created by homeopathic channels, they had the lowest engagement. Videos created by healthcare professionals achieved significantly higher engagement. Thus, even when seeking natural remedies on social media, viewers prefer content created by professionals. There is some existing literature on the role the recommended remedies play in preventing and/or treating skin cancers.
conclusionDermatologists should be aware of the various at-home therapies patients may try for their skin cancer. They should consider creating their own reliable and accurate social media content to educate the public about the risks of these dangerous trends and emphasize the importance of seeking evaluation for suspicious skin lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.