ArticleOxford medical case reports2025
A new case of
Article in Oxford medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfective endocarditis is a rare complication of untreated Whipple's disease. We present a case of infective endocarditis caused by CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old man with a bioprosthetic aortic valve and pacemaker presented with two months of fever. He had a history of HLA-B27-negative ankylosing spondylitis treated with adalimumab. Examination revealed a systolic aortic murmur. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed vegetation on the aortic bioprosthetis. Serologies and cultures were negative. He underwent valve replacement, endocavitary pacemaker system removal, and epicardial pacemaker implantation. Valve tissue PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing were positive for
conclusionWhipple's endocarditis is difficult to diagnose due to its atypical presentation and frequent failure to meet Duke criteria. Tissue PCR plays a crucial role when standard microbiologic testing is inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.