Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40843028›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2025

Implementation of project management methodologies in microbiology research laboratories.

Piotr R Stempinski, Heather M Lamb, Jiaqi Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Piotr R Stempinski *W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4694-3448
Heather M Lamb *W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-0633
Jiaqi QianDepartment of Commerce Operations, Spectrum Brands, Middleton, WI 53562, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6877-2201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing complexity and collaborative nature of scientific research projects underscore the need to implement project management practices to manage resources and funding, ensure data quality and prevent delays in project progress. Here, we introduce three major project management methodologies, including agile, waterfall and hybrid approaches, and explore their suitability for biological and microbiological research laboratories. Variables that may influence choosing an appropriate strategy for managing projects are considered, including the size and experience of a research group. In the following article, we provide an overview of the five major stages of project planning and execution, focusing on implementing each of the discussed strategies in the research laboratory. Furthermore, we discuss the composition of the research team and outline the responsibilities assigned to each team member based on their role in the project. This paper highlights potential risks and challenges that may negatively impact research progress, underscoring the need for proper project planning. Applying proper project management methodologies is often neglected in academic research, leading to serious delays and waste of valuable resources.

Indexed as

leadership developmentproject managementresearch designresearch managementresearch methodology

Identifiers

PMID40843028
PMCPMC12365402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.