ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Automated interpretation of PD-L1 CPS based on multi-AI models integration strategy in gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Enhanced Biomarker Interpretation on Cytology Cell Blocks: Foundations and Emerging Opportunities in Spatial Pathobiology.The American journal of pathology · 2026Review
- A transformer-based multimodal deep learning model for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression level in glioma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Overview of Gastric Cancer Immunohistochemistry: Key Biomarkers, Advanced Detection Methods, and Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for biomarker prediction in gastric cancer: from histopathology to multimodal integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oral Pathology: Evidence Summary and Implementation Gaps.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) evaluation plays a pivotal role in predicting immunotherapy efficacy for gastric cancer. However, manual CPS assessment suffers from significant inter-observer variability among pathologists, leading to clinical inconsistencies. To address this limitation, we developed a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that automates PD-L1 CPS quantification for patients with gastric cancer (GC) using whole slide images (WSIs). Methods: We developed a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that automates PD-L1 CPS quantification for patients with gastric cancer (GC) using whole slide images (WSIs). Our pipeline firstly employs a dual-network architecture for tumor region detection: MobileNet for patch-level classification and U-Net for pixel-level segmentation. Followed by a YOLO-based cell detection model to compute PD-L1 expression on different cells for CPS calculation. A total of 308 GC WSIs were included, including 210 in the internal cohort and 98 in the external cohort. Within the internal cohort, 100 WSIs were utilized for the model development, while the remaining 110 WSIs served as an internal testing set for comparative analysis between AI-derived CPS values and pathologist-derived reference standards. Results: The AI-derived CPS demonstrated strong concordance with expert pathologists' consensus in internal cohort (Cohen's kappa = 0.782). Furthermore, the AI-based CPS prediction pipeline was evaluated for its performance in the external cohort, and showed robust performance (Cohen's kappa = 0.737). Discussion: Our system provides a standardized decision-support tool for immunotherapy stratification in GC management, demonstrating potential to improve CPS assessment reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.