ArticlePRX life
Collective Dynamics of Frustrated Biological Neuron Networks.
Article in PRX life. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To maintain normal functionality, it is necessary for a multicellular organism to generate robust responses to external temporal signals. However, the underlying mechanisms to coordinate the collective dynamics of cells remain poorly understood. Here, we study the calcium activity of biological neuron networks excited by periodic ATP stimuli. We use micropatterning to control the cells' physical connectivity. We find that whereas isolated cells become more synchronized in their calcium activity at long driving periods, connected cells become less synchronized, despite expressing more gap junctions which enable calcium exchange. To understand this result, we use a mathematical model in which a bifurcation analysis has previously shown coupling-induced desynchronization in an oscillatory network. Using parameters close to this bifurcation but in the excitable regime, we find that this desynchronization persists and can explain the experimental observations. The model further predicts that co-culturing with gap-junction-deficient cells should restore synchronization, which experiments confirm. Combining quantitative experiments, the physical and biological manipulation of cells, and mathematical modeling, our results suggest that cell-to-cell connectivity significantly affects how populations encode an external temporal signal as it slows down: Sparse networks synchronize due to longer entrainment, whereas highly connected networks can desynchronize due to dynamic frustration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.