ArticleAcoustics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Agreement in Voice Acoustic Parameters: A Repeated Measures Case Study Across Varied Recording Instruments, Speech Samples, and Daily Timeframes.
Article in Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Embracing variability: toward proactive and precision-based voice science.Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: The aim was to assess the agreement between microphone-derived and neck accelerometer-derived voice acoustic parameters and their associations with recording moments and speech types. Methods: Using simultaneous recordings, a 7-week study on a single individual was conducted to reduce intersubject variability. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, and associations were examined with generalized estimating equations. Results: Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias between microphone (MIC) and accelerometer (ACC) measurements for alpha ratio, CPP, PPE, SPL SD, fundamental frequency (fo) mean, and SD. Speech type and measurement timing were significantly associated with alpha ratio, while the instrument was not. Microphone measurements resulted in slightly lower CPP compared to the accelerometer, while reading samples yielded higher CPP compared to vowel productions. PPE, SPL SD, and fo mean showed significant associations with speech type, based on univariate analysis. Microphone measurements yielded a statistically smaller fo SD compared to the accelerometer, while reading productions had a larger fo SD than vowel productions. Conclusion: Fundamental frequency, alpha ratio, PPE, and SPL SD values were robust, regardless of the instrument used, suggesting the potential use of accelerometers in less-controlled environments. These findings are crucial for enhancing confidence in voice metrics and exploring efficient clinical assessment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.