ArticlePhotoacoustics2025
Sparse scanning encoding and neural network decoding for compressed photoacoustic microscopy.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) offers high-resolution, non-invasive, and label-free imaging, making it invaluable for biomedical research. However, slow data acquisition and high sampling requirements remain key challenges that limit its broader applicability and scalability. We propose an Information-Efficient Photoacoustic Microscopy (IE-PAM) that jointly integrates sparse scanning encoding with neural network decoding to achieve high-quality reconstruction from extremely limited measurements. Specifically, IE-PAM employs a sparse-scanning acquisition scheme guided by random binary masks and reconstructs high-fidelity images using AFDU-Net, a custom-designed neural decoder trained on fully sampled ground truth data. Our system can faithfully recover detailed anatomical structures from as little as 1.5 % of the full sampling rate, corresponding to more than a 66-fold increase in acquisition efficiency. In in-vivo experiments on mouse ear vasculature, IE-PAM outperforms both traditional and learning-based baselines in fine vascular fidelity, artifact suppression, and robustness across varying sampling rates. By minimizing information redundancy at the acquisition stage and enabling accurate reconstruction from minimal data, IE-PAM provides a foundation for efficient, fast and scalable photoacoustic imaging in both preclinical and research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.