Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Recombinase polymerase amplification combined with CRISPR/Cas12a technology for rapid on-site detection of duck adenovirus 3.

Qi-Zhang Liang, Wei Chen, Yuhai Bi, Weiwei Wang, Rong-Chang Liu, Qiu-Ling Fu, Guang-Hua Fu, Long-Fei Cheng, Nan-Song Jiang, Ting Zhu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qi-Zhang Liang *Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Wei Chen *Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Yuhai BiCAS Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Weiwei WangFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Rong-Chang LiuFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Qiu-Ling FuFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Guang-Hua FuFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Long-Fei ChengFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Nan-Song JiangFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Ting ZhuCollege of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Hong-Mei ChenFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Yu HuangFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Avian Diseases Control and Prevention, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duck adenovirus 3 (DAdV-3) causes liver damage and bleeding, with morbidity rates ranging from 40 to 55% and mortality rates between 35 and 43%. Co-infection with other pathogens complicates disease control, significantly impacting the duck breeding industry. Currently, there have been no effective vaccines or treatments for DAdV-3. Therefore, rapid, specific, and sensitive detection methods are crucial for preventing and controlling this virus. Our study developed a lateral flow strip (LFS) detection method using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and CRISPR/Cas12a. The RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-LFS method, performed at 37°C, allowed for result visualization without sophisticated equipment. It targeted the DAdV-3 Fiber-2 gene and achieved a detection limit of 3.0 gene copies. Additionally, this method demonstrated high specificity, with no cross-reactivity to eight other avian viruses. The reaction time of RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-LFS is only 45 min. Analysis of 95 waterfowl samples showed 98.95% consistency and agreement with quantitative polymerase chain reaction using the Fiber-2 RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-LFS method. These findings highlighted the potential of this user-friendly, rapid, sensitive, and accurate detection method for on-site DAdV-3 detection.

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas12aDAdV-3LFSon-site detectionRPA

Identifiers

PMID40842840
PMCPMC12364882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.