ArticleCureus2025
Morphometric Evaluation of Changes in Alveolar Bone and Root Length During Mandibular Incisor Retraction in Class I Bimaxillary Protrusion: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Orthodontic treatment often involves first premolar extraction and anterior tooth retraction to achieve aesthetic and functional harmony in bimaxillary protrusion cases. However, excessive retraction may cause complications such as root resorption and bone loss. This study aimed to evaluate morphometric changes in anterior mandibular alveolar bone and root length during retraction of the mandibular incisors in patients with class I bimaxillary protrusion using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The objective of this study was to assess changes in alveolar bone width, height, and root length before and after retraction. Materials and methods This prospective observational study included 32 systemically healthy patients aged 18-30 years with class I bimaxillary protrusion requiring first premolar extractions. CBCT scans (pre- and post-retraction) were analyzed using standardized imaging parameters. Patients underwent orthodontic treatment with pre-adjusted edgewise appliances and temporary anchorage devices for maximum anchorage. The alveolar bone width, height, and root length were measured in the mandibular incisors. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were assessed, and the data were analyzed using paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results Labial alveolar bone height, as determined by the vertical distance between the cementoenamel junction and alveolar crest, decreased significantly across all mandibular incisors post-retraction, whereas lingual bone height increased in all teeth, suggesting crestal bone apposition and resorption on the labial and lingual sides, respectively. The labial bone width decreased significantly, whereas the lingual bone width increased in all incisors, suggesting labial root movement with retraction. The root length was significantly reduced in all incisors, indicating the risk of root resorption. No significant intragroup differences were found among the incisors (p > 0.05); however, intergroup comparisons confirmed significant pre- and post-retraction changes (p < 0.05), indicating dynamic bone remodeling. Conclusion The retraction of the mandibular incisors in bimaxillary protrusion significantly altered alveolar bone dimensions and reduced root length with site-specific variations. CBCT proved essential for precise assessment, emphasizing the need for controlled retraction to balance aesthetic and functional outcomes while minimizing complications. Future research should explore long-term stability and strategies to mitigate root resorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.