ReviewCureus2025
Cardiac Cephalgia as a Manifestation of Acute Coronary Events: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndromes often have atypical presentations, especially in female and elderly populations, leading to considerable diagnostic challenges. Cardiac cephalgia (CC), or headache caused by myocardial ischemia, is a rare and often neglected manifestation, a situation that deserves the interest of medical professionals. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to synthesize available literature on this intriguing phenomenon. A thorough search was conducted on six databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and EBSCO, targeting papers published between 2000 and 2023. Ten peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case reports, with a total participant pool of 80,202. Several emergent themes were noted: the potential for CC to be the only symptom of ischemia, diagnostic misattributions to primary headache disorders, and clinical resolution noted following nitrate therapy or coronary interventions. Notwithstanding the narrow breadth of available evidence, which stems mainly from case reports, the findings suggest that clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for CC in patients who present with unexplained headaches and cardiovascular risk factors. Contemporary clinical guidelines rarely recognize this presentation, and additional prospective studies are necessary to develop diagnostic criteria and incorporate cardiac investigations into headache evaluation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.