Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842805›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Acceptance of Genetic Engineering Among Adults in the UAE: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Anas E Masoud, Hala A Mesmar, Musa'ab Omair, Naema M Alkaabi, Maha M Alqaydi, Manahil A Dafalla, Suni Ebby, Amal Hussein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anas E MasoudGenetics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Hala A MesmarGenetics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Musa'ab OmairGenetics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Naema M AlkaabiGenetics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Maha M AlqaydiGenetics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Manahil A DafallaGenetics, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Suni EbbyBasic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Amal HusseinFamily and Community Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic engineering has emerged as a transformative technology with significant implications for healthcare, agriculture, and environmental sustainability. Despite its potential benefits, public perception and acceptance of genetic engineering vary widely across different regions and populations. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and acceptance of genetic engineering among adults in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire specifically designed to evaluate multiple aspects relevant to the objectives of the study. Participants were recruited through online platforms, mainly WhatsApp and LinkedIn. Eligible individuals were adults aged 20 to 50 years, fluent in Arabic or English, and residing in the UAE. Those who were nonresidents, declined consent, or lacked basic awareness of genetic engineering were excluded. The questionnaire assessed participants' knowledge of genetic engineering concepts, attitudes toward various applications, and overall acceptance of the technology. Demographic information was collected to analyze correlations with knowledge, attitudes, and acceptance levels.

resultsOut of the total 384 respondents, 300 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Results indicated that while most participants (68%) had basic knowledge of genetic engineering, a detailed understanding of specific applications was limited. Attitudes toward genetic engineering were generally positive (57%), particularly regarding medical applications, though concerns about ethical implications and safety were prevalent. Acceptance levels were moderately high (63%), with education level and prior exposure to scientific information showing significant positive correlations with acceptance. In addition, there was strong opposition to its use in nonmedical contexts, such as determining physical traits or gender. Statistically significant associations were found between knowledge and nationality (p < 0.01), occupation (p < 0.01), and income (p = 0.025), as well as between attitudes and marital status (p = 0.045) and presence of genetic disease (p < 0.01). Positive attitudes were also significantly associated with higher acceptance (p < 0.001).

conclusionThis study highlights that the majority of adults in the UAE possess some knowledge of genetic engineering and exhibit generally positive attitudes toward its application. While the findings suggest an overall acceptance of genetic engineering among participants, there remains a mix of positive and negative perceptions influenced by various demographic and sociocultural factors. These insights can inform targeted educational initiatives and policy development to enhance public understanding and responsible implementation of genetic engineering technologies in the UAE and similar developing regions.

Indexed as

attitudesbiotechnologyethicsgenetic engineeringknowledge assessmentpublic perceptionscience communicationtechnology acceptanceunited arab emirates

Identifiers

PMID40842805
PMCPMC12365708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.