ArticleCureus2025
Measuring Compliance and Perceptions of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Prevention Programme: Insights From Female University Athletes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping Research on Warm-Up in Athletes: A Scoping Review with Evidence Gap Map.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives This pilot study aimed to measure the compliance of female university athletes with a three-month "Prevent Injury, Enhance Performance" (PEP) warm-up, a validated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention programme, and to gather athletes' perceptions, including barriers to participation in the prevention programme. Methods Participants were recruited from "The Ospreys" (Cambridge University's elite sportswomen's club) and considered eligible if they were English-speaking female athletes competing in a high-risk sport, aged 18 to 30. Participants completed a questionnaire pre- and post-completion of three months of the PEP prevention programme. Gathered information included participant demographics, sporting history, education and awareness of ACL injury risk factors, prevention programme perceptions, and compliance. Results A total of 45 participants were recruited, with a mean age of 21.69 years (± 2.51). The most common self-perceived risk of ACL injury among participants was 3 (out of 10) on a Likert scale. A total of 62% (n = 28) claimed awareness of ACL injury risk factors. The mean compliance with the prevention programme was 1.46 times per week. The time-consuming nature of the prevention programme was the most reported barrier to compliance (94%, n = 42). Conclusion Adherence to a three-month ACL injury prevention programme was limited, and the programme's time-intensive nature was perceived as the most common obstacle to completion. Few athletes were aware of the risk factors and prevention methods for ACL injuries. To prevent the severe long-term impacts of ACL injuries, it is crucial to investigate further the barriers to adopting injury prevention programmes. More time-efficient injury prevention programmes could be developed to improve athlete engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.