ReviewCureus2025
Insights Into AI-Enabled Early Diagnosis of Oral Cancer: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-Based Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Malignant Transformation of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Toward Smart Salivary Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review of Heavy Metal Biomarkers and Digital Risk Modeling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-assisted image analysis ofBioinformation · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the study of oral lichen planus characteristics: a review.BDJ open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral cancer (OC) remains a significant global health burden, with early detection being critical to improve prognosis and survival rates. Hence, early assessment is the primary challenge in improving OC outcomes due to gaps in specialist referrals and early diagnosis. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance the early detection of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and OC. We aimed to assess the various AI techniques for early OC diagnosis by searching PubMed for articles published between January 2016 and May 2025 using terms like "artificial intelligence", "deep learning", "machine learning", and "oral cancer". Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted. Of 88 articles retrieved, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies originated from Southeast Asia and employed AI methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), deep CNNs, artificial neural networks (ANNs), random forests, and decision trees. Standard data inputs included photographic and mobile images, with cytology and radiographic images also used. Deep CNNs showed the highest performance concerning sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Despite variability in techniques and datasets, overall diagnostic performance was promising. The study indicates that AI tools offer a strong potential for enhancing early diagnosis, particularly in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.