Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842725›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2025

Navigating uncertainty in museum workflows: genomic data mining and curation of the Diptera collections hosted at RMCA.

Lore Esselens, Pia Addison, Jacqueline Bakengesa, Luis Bota, Laura Canhanga, Domingos Cugala, Beatriz Daniel, Marc De Meyer, Hélène Delatte, Jean-Marc Herpers and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Lore EsselensRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-7663
Pia AddisonUniversity of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa University of Stellenbosch Stellenbosch South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-339X
Jacqueline BakengesaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5621-7215
Luis BotaNational Fruit Fly Laboratory, Chimoio, Mozambique National Fruit Fly Laboratory Chimoio Mozambique.
Laura CanhangaEduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique Eduardo Mondlane University Maputo Mozambique.
Domingos CugalaEduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique Eduardo Mondlane University Maputo Mozambique.
Beatriz DanielEduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique Eduardo Mondlane University Maputo Mozambique.
Marc De MeyerRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0755-2898
Hélène DelatteCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, La Réunion, France Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement La Réunion France.
Jean-Marc HerpersRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.
Kurt JordaensRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-5944
Sija KabotaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro Tanzania.
Abdul KudraSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro Tanzania.
Ramadhani MajubwaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro Tanzania.
Aruna ManrakhanCitrus Research International, Nelspruit, South Africa Citrus Research International Nelspruit South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-4450
Mirene MussumbeEduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique Eduardo Mondlane University Maputo Mozambique.
Maulid MwatawalaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro Tanzania.
Franck TheetenRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-538X
Didier Van den SpiegelRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.
Sam VanbergenRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.
Carl VangestelRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.
Massimiliano VirgilioRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-6886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of its extensive Diptera holdings, the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA) houses over 100,000 specimens of Tephritidae and Syrphidae, which represent a critical resource for taxonomic and systematic research. Here, we present a feasibility study evaluating streamlined workflows for genomic data mining and archiving in museum collections. We analysed DNA yield, quality and sequencing performance from more than 1,400 insect vouchers and found few predictable trends, reflecting the nature of heterogeneous and skewed groups of samples collected under largely unknown field conditions. Regardless, our results show that Illumina short read whole genome sequencing can work well even with degraded insect material. In this context, routine short-read sequencing offers a practical first step for genomic data mining, particularly for large collections. It enables us to reserve more complex and resource-intensive methods for the subset of samples that fail initial sequencing (7% of specimens, in our case). As an outcome of this work, RMCA's archiving system has been adapted to integrate genomic data and metadata alongside traditional specimen records. We argue that genomic data should be treated as an integral component of collection management, enhancing scientific value, supporting long term preservation and improving traceability of genetic resources in natural history collections.

Indexed as

hoverfliesmuseomicsnatural history collectionstrue fruit flieswhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40842725
PMCPMC12365672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.