ArticleBMJ public health2025
Family planning in Jordan: a cross-sectional study on service availability, knowledge and attitudes among women.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite progress made in improving family planning (FP) services in Jordan, significant barriers remain. This study aimed to assess the availability of FP services in primary care settings and explore women's knowledge and attitudes toward FP to support the development of more person-centred FP services and interventions. Methods: The Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) was conducted in 2022 in six governorates to assess FP service availability in Jordan. Also, a cross-sectional study was conducted among women who attended primary health centres (PHCs) for postpartum care or immunisation of newborns to assess their knowledge, attitude and past experience of using FP, and family support. Results: SARA results showed limited healthcare capacity for FP services with inadequate FP training mainly in PHCs and village centres, and a lack of reproductive health training in most centres. Among 972 women, 6% had never heard of FP, and only 47.1% received FP counselling before their last delivery. About 76% considered contraceptives expensive, despite being free for Jordanians and refugees. Only 22.7% discussed contraceptive use with their husbands. The proportion of women who visited PHC for antenatal care ≤8 times was 56.8% among Syrian women and 46.3% among Jordanian women, while it was 68.7% among women living in Mafraq governorate and 36.8% in Irbid governorate. Conclusion: Barriers to FP services include limited availability in rural areas, insufficient knowledge and negative attitudes, with evidence of disparities in antenatal care access across demographics and regions. Awareness programmes and enhanced staff capacity are recommended to improve FP service access and utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.