ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Bridging the clinical gap: Confidence informed IDH prediction in brain gliomas using MRI and deep learning.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Anatomy to Genomics Using a Multi-Task Deep Learning Approach for Comprehensive Glioma Profiling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase status in glioma using hierarchical attention-based deep 3D multiple instance learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status is a key molecular marker in diagnosing and treating brain tumors. Currently, it is determined via invasive tissue biopsy. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have offered promising non-invasive alternatives for determining IDH status. However, their clinical translation is hindered by a significant gap between DL predictions and their clinical applicability. The limited transparency of many DL-networks and inadequate evaluation metrics hinders trust and adoption, as clinicians require clear and validated insights for determining IDH status. These challenges highlight the need for robust validation and measures of predictive reliability to make DL-predictions clinically actionable. Methods: We developed a unique approach for non-invasive prediction of IDH status using MRI. We combine a voxel-wise-segmentation network(MC-net) with Bayesian logistic regression (BLR) to provide an IDH status and estimate confidence scores. We utilized a comprehensive dataset of 2,481 glioma cases from eight institutions. Results: Our framework(MC-net + BLR) demonstrated robust performance achieving 96.4% and 95.1% classification accuracies on diverse databases, with an AUC of 0.98. The BLR was implemented exclusively on held-out test data, ensuring that the derived confidence scores are independent of the training or validation phases. The derived confidence scores showed a low Brier score of 0.0125, highlighting its superior calibration and uncertainty quantification. Conclusion: The developed framework provides an IDH status and a confidence score, offering clinicians an additional layer of assurance in prediction reliability. It bridges the gap between high-performing DL models and their clinical applicability by addressing the challenges in prediction reliability. Our framework is a significant advancement in non-invasive determination of IDH-status and confidence-informed therapeutic decision-making in neuro-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.