ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Estimating overall survival of glioblastoma patients using clinical variables, tumor size, and location.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Grade-Dependent Prognostic Value of Classical Clinicopathological Factors in Glioma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Clinical Diagnosis-based Treatment in Glioblastoma Patients Aged ≥80 Years: A Single-center Cohort Study Focused on Performance Status Maintenance.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prognosis of glioblastoma is crucial for better-informed treatment decisions, potentially leading to improved disease management. We investigated whether clinical variables, tumor size, and location, can serve as prognostic factors. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study enrolled 1318 adult patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma undergoing first-time surgery, with survival censored for 188 patients. Pre-operative brain MRIs were used to compute tumor size and derive advanced radiological features describing tumor location, later refined by expert-based opinion. Post-operative MRIs were used to measure the enhancing residual tumor volume. The prognostic quality of all variables, measurements, and features was assessed as inputs of three survival regression models (CoxPH, Random Survival Forests, DeepSurv) to predict overall survival, under five timepoints of patient treatment: onset presentation, assessment by multidisciplinary board, intervention planning, post-intervention evaluation, and chemoradiotherapy planning. Model evaluation was performed with the C-index, Brier Score over Time, and Integrated Brier Score. Results: Multivariable Cox analysis identified most clinical variables and tumor size as strong predictors of patient survival, with varying hazard ratios across timepoints. DeepSurv was consistently the top performing model under all possible inputs and at all timepoints, yielding mean test C-index scores ranging from 61.71% to 70.29%, and mean Integrated Brier Scores ranging from 8.57% to 7.63%. Conclusion: Clinical variables, tumor size, and location carry prognostic value for the overall survival of patients with glioblastoma. The best predictive performance was observed under a Deep Survival model using all variables at the stage of chemoradiotherapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.